--- description: Get detailed information about BrowserStack and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about BrowserStack price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale \& optimize testing. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 774 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses BrowserStack? Developer teams across industries including but not limited to Finance and Insurance, Education, Technology, Media \& Publishing, Retail, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 774 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$39.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Monitoring - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Archiving & Retention - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing - Bottleneck Identification - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Tracking - Continuous Integration - Data Visualization - Defect Tracking - Document Management - Hierarchical View - Incident Management - Issue Tracking - Load Scenarios - Load Testing - Mobile Testing - Monitoring - Multiple Test Types - Network Monitoring - Performance Management - Performance Metrics - Performance Testing Tools - Project Management - Quality Assurance - Quantitative Metrics - Reporting/Analytics - Repository Management - Requirements Management - Risk Management - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Surveys & Feedback - Test Script Reviews - Testing Management - Testing Scripts - Traceability - Version Control - Video recording/Transcriptions - Web Testing - Workflow Management ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Load Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Test Management Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 2. [UserQ](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1037462/userq) — 4.3/5 (13 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (73 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1028715/testomatio) — 4.7/5 (23 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Fast and Reliable Testing Made Easy" — 4.0/5 > **RUPAL** | *24 November 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love how easy it is to test on so many real devices without setting anything up. It saves a lot of time and works smoothly. > > **Cons**: At times the performance can slow down, especially during peak hours. A few devices take longer to start, and occasionally the screen refresh feels laggy. The pricing also feels a bit high when you need multiple users or more parallel sessions. > > Overall, my experience has been very good. It makes cross-browser and cross-device testing quick and stress-free. It really helps me catch issues early and speed up my testing work. ----- ### "Excellent App" — 5.0/5 > **Tijesh** | *23 September 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack is an excellent platform for cross-browser testing. It offers a vast selection of real devices and browsers, making it easy to ensure compatibility across different platforms and configurations. The user interface is intuitive, and the performance is reliable. > > **Cons**: BrowserStack is a valuable tool for cross-browser testing, but could benefit from enhanced device and browser coverage, especially for newer technologies. Additionally, more granular performance metrics and a more robust debugging interface would be helpful for in-depth testing and troubleshooting. > > BrowserStack offers a comprehensive and reliable cross-browser testing experience. Its vast device and browser coverage, user-friendly interface, and robust performance make it a valuable tool for web developers and QA teams. ----- ### "Overall a decent platform for all the testing needs" — 3.0/5 > **Dheeraj** | *24 September 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: One stop solution for multiple testing needs > > **Cons**: Many features are available for free of cost ( example the accessibility report created by BrowserStack was same as the one created by lighthouse which is free to use in Chrome browser) ----- ### "Reliable Cross Browser Testing Tool - Browserstack" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *2 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: - I can test on alomst any real iphone or android model without needing the physical hardwhere. - It makes it very easy to test my local dev env even when i'm behind a company's VPN. - It works well with our existing Playwright and Pyhton automation scripts. > > **Cons**: - There's often a big lag between my mouse click \& the remote devide responding. - It can take 20 30 sec, just to start a session, which feels slow when you are in a hurry. - It's definitely on the expensive side, especially when you start adding parallel testing slots for the team. > > It's a good tool that has become a part of our workflow. It helps us catch CSS bugs and layout issues on mobile Safari that we just can't see on desktop emulators. While the speed could be better and the cost is high, the reliability of testing on real devices makes it worth it for a professional team. ----- ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Platform with Strong Automation Support" — 5.0/5 > **Tashvik** | *3 April 2026* | Construction | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Access to a wide range of real devices and browsers Strong automation support with parallel execution Easy integration with CI/CD pipelines Useful debugging tools like logs and video recordings > > **Cons**: Pricing can be on the higher side for smaller teams Test management features could be more robust Occasional latency in live sessions > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It has significantly streamlined cross-browser testing and reduced the need for maintaining physical test infrastructure. Despite minor drawbacks like pricing and occasional performance lags, it remains a reliable and essential tool in the QA and development workflow. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data