--- description: Get detailed information about BrowserStack and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about BrowserStack price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale \& optimize testing. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 775 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses BrowserStack? Developer teams across industries including but not limited to Finance and Insurance, Education, Technology, Media \& Publishing, Retail, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 775 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$39.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Monitoring - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Archiving & Retention - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing - Bottleneck Identification - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Tracking - Continuous Integration - Data Visualization - Defect Tracking - Document Management - Hierarchical View - Incident Management - Issue Tracking - Load Scenarios - Load Testing - Mobile Testing - Monitoring - Multiple Test Types - Network Monitoring - Performance Management - Performance Metrics - Performance Testing Tools - Project Management - Quality Assurance - Quantitative Metrics - Reporting/Analytics - Repository Management - Requirements Management - Risk Management - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Surveys & Feedback - Test Script Reviews - Testing Management - Testing Scripts - Traceability - Version Control - Video recording/Transcriptions - Web Testing - Workflow Management ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Load Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Test Management Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 2. [UserQ](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1037462/userq) — 4.3/5 (13 reviews) 3. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (73 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1028715/testomatio) — 4.7/5 (23 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Fast and Reliable Testing Made Easy" — 4.0/5 > **RUPAL** | *24 November 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love how easy it is to test on so many real devices without setting anything up. It saves a lot of time and works smoothly. > > **Cons**: At times the performance can slow down, especially during peak hours. A few devices take longer to start, and occasionally the screen refresh feels laggy. The pricing also feels a bit high when you need multiple users or more parallel sessions. > > Overall, my experience has been very good. It makes cross-browser and cross-device testing quick and stress-free. It really helps me catch issues early and speed up my testing work. ----- ### "Excellent App" — 5.0/5 > **Tijesh** | *23 September 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack is an excellent platform for cross-browser testing. It offers a vast selection of real devices and browsers, making it easy to ensure compatibility across different platforms and configurations. The user interface is intuitive, and the performance is reliable. > > **Cons**: BrowserStack is a valuable tool for cross-browser testing, but could benefit from enhanced device and browser coverage, especially for newer technologies. Additionally, more granular performance metrics and a more robust debugging interface would be helpful for in-depth testing and troubleshooting. > > BrowserStack offers a comprehensive and reliable cross-browser testing experience. Its vast device and browser coverage, user-friendly interface, and robust performance make it a valuable tool for web developers and QA teams. ----- ### "Overall a decent platform for all the testing needs" — 3.0/5 > **Dheeraj** | *24 September 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: One stop solution for multiple testing needs > > **Cons**: Many features are available for free of cost ( example the accessibility report created by BrowserStack was same as the one created by lighthouse which is free to use in Chrome browser) ----- ### "Fast and Efficient Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *9 July 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack is easy to use and offers excellent browser and device coverage for efficient cross-browser testing. It saves time by quickly identifying compatibility issues across different environments. > > **Cons**: The pricing can be expensive for smaller teams, and remote sessions may occasionally experience slight lag. Some advanced features also take time for new users to learn. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very good. It's a reliable and user-friendly platform that makes cross-browser testing fast and efficient. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 April 2026* | Chemicals | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Cons**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- Page: 1 / 32\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data