--- description: Get detailed information about BrowserStack and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about BrowserStack price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack Page: 1 / 31\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers \& QAs to expand test coverage, scale \& optimize testing. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 749 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses BrowserStack? Developer teams across industries including but not limited to Finance and Insurance, Education, Technology, Media \& Publishing, Retail, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 749 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: BrowserStack - **Founded**: 2011 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$39.00 - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: BrowserStack offers a free trial for new users, after which the software is available on monthly and annual subscriptions. An open-source version is also available. Pricing and functionality scales with the number of tests, users, or screenshots. Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) Automate Pro: Starts at $129/month (billed annually) and $169/month (billed monthly) Automate Mobile: Starts at $199/month (billed annually) and $249/month (billed monthly) Percy: A free version is available for visual testing on 5000 screenshots and unlimited users Percy Professional: Starts at $99/month (billed annually) and 129/month (billed monthly) for 25,000 screenshots/month App Live: Starts at $29/month (billed annually) and $39/month (billed monthly) App Automate: A free version includes 30 interactive testing minutes, 100 automated testing minutes daily, and 4 real mobile devices. Subscription starts at $159/month (billed annually) and $199/month (billed monthly) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Brazil, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Denmark, Germany, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, Singapore, South Africa, US Virgin Islands, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Activity Monitoring - Alerts/Notifications - Annotations - Anomaly Detection - Archiving & Retention - Audience Targeting - Audit Management - Audit Trail - Automated Testing - Bottleneck Identification - Collaboration Tools - Compliance Tracking - Continuous Integration - Data Visualization - Defect Tracking - Document Management - Hierarchical View - Incident Management - Issue Tracking - Load Scenarios - Load Testing - Mobile Testing - Monitoring - Multiple Test Types - Network Monitoring - Performance Management - Performance Metrics - Performance Testing Tools - Project Management - Quality Assurance - Quantitative Metrics - Reporting/Analytics - Repository Management - Requirements Management - Risk Management - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Surveys & Feedback - Test Script Reviews - Testing Management - Testing Scripts - Traceability - Version Control - Video recording/Transcriptions - Web Testing - Workflow Management ## Integrations (16 total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... and 1 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Load Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Test Management Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (86 reviews) 2. [UserQ](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1037462/userq) — 4.6/5 (12 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (68 reviews) 4. [TestRail](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (177 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1028715/testomatio) — 4.8/5 (22 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Fast and Reliable Testing Made Easy" — 4.0/5 > **RUPAL** | *24 November 2025* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I love how easy it is to test on so many real devices without setting anything up. It saves a lot of time and works smoothly. > > **Cons**: At times the performance can slow down, especially during peak hours. A few devices take longer to start, and occasionally the screen refresh feels laggy. The pricing also feels a bit high when you need multiple users or more parallel sessions. > > Overall, my experience has been very good. It makes cross-browser and cross-device testing quick and stress-free. It really helps me catch issues early and speed up my testing work. ----- ### "Excellent App" — 5.0/5 > **Tijesh** | *23 September 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack is an excellent platform for cross-browser testing. It offers a vast selection of real devices and browsers, making it easy to ensure compatibility across different platforms and configurations. The user interface is intuitive, and the performance is reliable. > > **Cons**: BrowserStack is a valuable tool for cross-browser testing, but could benefit from enhanced device and browser coverage, especially for newer technologies. Additionally, more granular performance metrics and a more robust debugging interface would be helpful for in-depth testing and troubleshooting. > > BrowserStack offers a comprehensive and reliable cross-browser testing experience. Its vast device and browser coverage, user-friendly interface, and robust performance make it a valuable tool for web developers and QA teams. ----- ### "Overall a decent platform for all the testing needs" — 3.0/5 > **Dheeraj** | *24 September 2024* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: One stop solution for multiple testing needs > > **Cons**: Many features are available for free of cost ( example the accessibility report created by BrowserStack was same as the one created by lighthouse which is free to use in Chrome browser) ----- ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Great Coverage" — 5.0/5 > **Amar** | *24 March 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing incredibly easy. The wide range of real devices and browsers available on demand is a huge advantage, especially when compared to maintaining an in-house device lab. The interface is intuitive, and setting up tests (both manual and automated) is straightforward. Integration with tools like Selenium, Cypress, and CI/CD pipelines works smoothly. > > **Cons**: The pricing can be a bit high for smaller teams or startups. Also, performance can occasionally lag when using certain real devices, especially during peak hours. > > Overall, BrowserStack has significantly improved our QA workflow by reducing testing time and increasing coverage. It’s a dependable tool for ensuring consistent user experience across platforms. Despite the cost, the value it provides makes it worth the investment for teams that prioritize quality. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24 March 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Cons**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- Page: 1 / 31\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Structured Data