--- description: Get detailed information about ACCELQ and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about ACCELQ price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: ACCELQ Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [ACCELQ](/software/161589/accelq) # ACCELQ Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/161589/accelq Page: 1 / 7\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/161589/accelq?page=2) > ACCELQ is the only cloud-based continuous testing platform that automates API and web testing without writing a single line of code. > > Verdict: Rated **4.9/5** by 135 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses ACCELQ? Customers looking to improve their application Quality, achieve in-sprint automation to align with Continuous Delivery. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.9/5** | 135 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.9/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 100% | (10/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: ACCELQ - **Location**: Irving, US - **Founded**: 2014 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Please contact ACCELQ for pricing. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (Mobile), iPhone (Mobile), iPad (Mobile) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Australia, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, India, Ireland, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States ## Features - Collaboration Tools - Hierarchical View - Software Testing Management - Supports Parallel Execution - Test Script Reviews ## Integrations (5 total) - BrowserStack - Jenkins - Jira - Sauce Labs - TeamCity ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/31124/performance-testing/software) ## Alternatives 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/162900/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (774 reviews) 2. [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/170732/lambdatest) — 4.6/5 (544 reviews) 3. [Katalon Studio](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1018018/katalon-studio) — 4.4/5 (706 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (69 reviews) 5. [Mailinator](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1012640/mailinator) — 4.7/5 (147 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Strong Value, Flexible Automation, and Reliable Support" — 4.0/5 > **Akhila** | *10 April 2026* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I liked most about ACCELQ is the strong value it delivers for the cost. It is highly customizable, which makes it adaptable to different testing needs and workflows. The platform handles complex use cases effectively, especially for end-to-end scenarios. Additionally, the support team is very responsive and helpful, which makes a big difference when dealing with challenges or scaling usage. > > **Cons**: One of the limitations I experienced with ACCELQ is around flexibility in certain advanced scenarios, where customization sometimes requires workarounds instead of straightforward solutions. There are also occasional challenges with dynamic element handling and stability in complex test flows. Additionally, some integrations and features feel less mature, and debugging failures can take more effort than expected due to limited visibility in certain areas. > > Overall, my experience with ACCELQ has been positive. It provides a strong platform for building and managing automated tests, especially for complex end-to-end workflows. The flexibility and customization options make it adaptable to different project needs, and it significantly reduces the effort required to scale automation. The support team has been a key strength, consistently responsive and helpful in resolving issues and guiding implementations. While there are some limitations in advanced scenarios and debugging can occasionally be challenging, the overall value, ease of use, and ability to handle real-world use cases make ACCELQ a reliable choice for test automation. ----- ### "Easy setup, catching the bugs early and both frontend and backend tests run locally without hassle" — 4.0/5 > **Anniken** | *2 October 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Been easy to learn, and little technical insight is needed to also cover more detailed and backend testing on my own with predefined commands. It's been great to be able to cover also more detailed and backend testing without involving developers for some additional code. The overview of the tests are clear and readable, and I like the easy switch between recording and not recording to be able to better change where in the test I need to continue working > > **Cons**: I'm missing more flexibility in views to work with and compare more in parallel to work faster. Also missing more focus on time management of the tests, but have hopes that the new dashboard with it's flexibility in setup also will cover this over time. > > We needed both frontend and backend testing, and all the scheduled tests needed to run locally on our own servers due to safety concerns for customer data, and AccelQ could give us that. Whenever I've run into problems or needed assistance on how to solve a task, I've always gotten quick help from support to find a solution. Scheduled tests are predictable, and we are catching more bugs than before at an earlier stage, with an average of 1-3 per week. More expensive than the others, and that was a discussion that almost changed the decision at first, but after I started using it, I do not regret the decision. ----- ### "AccelQ converted a manual tester to an automation tester" — 5.0/5 > **Dawn** | *30 March 2026* | Insurance | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Easy to use automation tool, extremely helpful community and support team and regular upgrades of the system with minimum disruption. > > **Cons**: That we did not use the tool sooner, That we did not use the tool sooner, That we did not use the tool sooner > > I have always called myself the anti automaton tester, but with AccelQ it was a seamless experience and it was so easy for me to use and the support is amazing from AccelQ and also from the community ----- ### "Amazing Accelq Automation tool" — 5.0/5 > **srinivas** | *9 April 2026* | Accounting | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: ACCELQ is an easy-to-use, codeless automation platform that helps teams quickly build and maintain automated tests. It improves efficiency, supports collaboration, and integrates well with modern development workflows. > > **Cons**: However, there is room for improvement in areas like debugging clarity and handling complex custom scenarios. > > I’ve had a great experience working with ACCELQ. It makes automation straightforward, especially for teams without deep coding expertise. The reusability of test steps and cloud execution are big advantages. With a few improvements in debugging and flexibility, it can become even more powerful. ----- ### "A Powerful Low‑Code Automation Platform That Boosts QA Productivity and Test Stability" — 5.0/5 > **Mahendra** | *8 May 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: 1. ACCELQ’s intuitive, low‑code approach makes it easier for both manual testers and beginners to transition into automation with minimal coding effort. 2. Enterprise‑grade security controls and role‑based access ensure safe handling of test assets and sensitive data. 3. Provides strong ROI by reducing automation development time, maintenance effort, and dependency on specialized automation skills. 4. Self‑healing locators and intelligent failure handling significantly reduce flaky tests caused by minor UI changes. 5. Fast test execution and efficient parallel runs help accelerate release cycles and feedback loops. 6. Flexible test design using reusable actions, parameters, and flows allows customization without complex scripting. 7. End‑to‑end automation support (web, API, mobile) and CI/CD integration greatly improve overall QA productivity and consistency. > > **Cons**: \> While low‑code, understanding ACCELQ’s asset‑based design and best practices takes time for new users. \> Advanced customization may feel restrictive compared to fully coded frameworks for highly complex scenarios. > > Easy learning curve with intuitive low‑code automation Strong security with enterprise‑level access controls Good value for money due to reduced automation and maintenance effort Fewer bugs/flaky tests thanks to self‑healing capabilities Fast performance with efficient and parallel test execution Flexible customization using reusable actions and parameters High productivity improvement across web, API, and CI/CD testing ----- Page: 1 / 7\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/161589/accelq?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/161589/accelq) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Structured Data