--- description: Get detailed information about Sencha Ext JS and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about Sencha Ext JS price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Sencha Ext JS Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [App Development Software](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [Sencha Ext JS](/software/148124/sencha-platform) # Sencha Ext JS Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148124/sencha-platform Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148124/sencha-platform?page=2) > Ext JS – A JavaScript framework with 140+ UI components for rapid development of web and mobile applications. > > Verdict: Rated **4.2/5** by 23 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Sencha Ext JS? Designed for businesses of all sizes, it is a front-end framework to build cross-platform applications with Sencha tools catering to enterprises, developers, UI/UX designers, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.2/5** | 23 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 3.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 3.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 70% | (7/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Sencha - **Founded**: 2007 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$1,499.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Austria, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Singapore, South Korea and 5 more ## Features - API - Compatibility Testing - Debugging - Graphical User Interface - Integrated Development Environment ## Support Options - Chat ## Category - [App Development Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Essential Studio](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/32602/essential-studio) — 4.5/5 (924 reviews) 2. [GitHub](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/129067/github) — 4.8/5 (6170 reviews) 3. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/101288/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3006 reviews) 4. [IntelliJ IDEA](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/136010/intellij-idea) — 4.7/5 (1257 reviews) 5. [Jira](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15367 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Fantastic for grid-heavy business applications" — 5.0/5 > **Richard** | *26 August 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Excellent framework with unparalleled grid functionality and a "one-stop shop" for developers of complex B2B business web apps who need a range of forms, grids, charts, calendars etc. in their apps. > > **Cons**: Steep learning curve for new hires and not as popular as other (free to developer) UX frameworks such as React or Angular. But ExtJs provides more functionality for complex grid-heavy business apps like in accounting, or ERP or logistics, maybe the $5K/developer up-front cost well worth it. > > Very good. Never needed support as there is plenty of online documentation including excellent documentation by Sencha. ----- ### "Built Strong, Maintained Weakly" — 2.0/5 > **Alessandro** | *27 August 2025* | Program Development | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: product was and remain a robust framework with complete group of object to manage/create a web business application. > > **Cons**: Customer support is inadequate. Tickets rarely receive thorough investigation, and the burden of proof falls on the reporter—who can spend weeks reproducing and documenting issues. Development also seems stalled: releases now arrive annually, whereas they used to be monthly > > After 10 years of development, we have no choice, we have to continue... or we have to rewrite everything ----- ### "Very good product, despite a few pain points." — 4.0/5 > **Will** | *7 May 2025* | Utilities | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: - MVC paradigm - built in UI themes and ability to bring our own easily - politeness with other runtime packages (D3, etc.) - comprehensive reference docs > > **Cons**: - Design of Ext means that Sencha Test is really required to have good Selenium-style tests. - Difficult to work with individual grid cells, rows, columns; whether addressing, getting, formatting or setting values. - Licensing related bug in Sencha cloud. We have two licenses per team member (Ext and Sencha Test). NPM registry only sees Ext license, so we cannot access Sencha Test packages. - We cannot get the sts executable to work at all on Windows 11. Funny exceptions. - At times there seems to be no way to do something that should be easy. Hard to describe precisely. A solution is always eventually found but not always elegant and sometimes only after painful trial and error. For example enabling/disabling UI actions based on form validation formulas. - Need more maturity on date/time handling. Ext.Date type does not properly support Olson time zones, and serialization for backend integration is a constant headache. > > Overall positive, saves a lot of time versus starting with just Bootstrap and jQuery. MVC paradigm helps with app design - if you use it as intended. ----- ### "End result is good, but high developer learning curve" — 4.0/5 > **Eric** | *26 August 2025* | Higher Education | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: Works well in major browsers. High quality ui for administration panels. Not mobile-friendly, but thats not a requirement for us. > > **Cons**: High developer learning curve. Slow build process with java (error messages shown that according to support should be ignored). Documentation could be better. License pricing is very high. Large json/js arrays with the code can be problematic to work in. > > Quite good but developer learning curve would make us unlikely to adopt it in new projects. End result is good, but high developer learning curve. ----- ### "It's a decent product" — 2.0/5 > **Verified Reviewer** | *11 September 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 0.0/10 > > **Pros**: Being able to easily create components that can be reusable is a really nice feature to be using in the build and development, code management is a okay, deployment is also fine, the value for the money I would not be able to answer, > > **Cons**: its near impossible to track down some of the bugs, customer support I'm not so sure, it is really hard to use the docs suck. > > It was fine, I enjoyed coding with it at times due to the increase of productivity from reusable features and common structure. other times I wanted to pull my hair out working with it ----- Page: 1 / 2\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148124/sencha-platform?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148124/sencha-platform) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data