--- description: Get detailed information about Responsive and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about Responsive price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Responsive Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Proposal Management Software](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/148054/Responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148054/Responsive Page: 1 / 9\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) > Responsive’s (formerly RFPIO) AI-driven Strategic Response Management platform drives more deals won with smarter, faster responses. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 190 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Responsive? Leading response teams — proposal, sales, presales, marketing, customer support, IT, security, compliance and more — trust Responsive to automate their RFP, RFI, DDQ and other RFX processes. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 190 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Location**: Beaverton, US - **Founded**: 2015 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Usage Based - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: Chinese, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Traditional Chinese - **Available Countries**: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden and 3 more ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Audit Trail - Automatic Formatting - Collaboration Tools - Content Library - Content Management - Data Import/Export - Document Management - Due Date Tracking - Full Text Search - Knowledge Base Management - Knowledge Library - Milestone Tracking - Progress Tracking - Project Planning/Scheduling - Proposal Generation - RFP Management - Reporting & Statistics - Reporting/Analytics - Reporting/Project Tracking - Search/Filter - Task Management - Templates - Third-Party Integrations - Time & Expense Tracking - Vendor Management - Version Control - Workflow Management ## Integrations (26 total) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... and 11 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [RFP Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/31555/rfp/software) - [Business Process Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) - [Knowledge Management Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30094/knowledge-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Breeze](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1073046/Breeze) — 5.0/5 (15 reviews) 2. [XaitPorter](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/76385/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (49 reviews) 3. [Axonaut](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/178036/axonaut) — 4.6/5 (22 reviews) 4. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1252 reviews) 5. [VT Docs](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/117155/visiblethread-docs) — 4.9/5 (52 reviews) ## Reviews ### "BioCatch Feedback" — 5.0/5 > **Sebastian** | *8 November 2024* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: the consolidation of resources and the ease of searching and retrieval > > **Cons**: No cons so far. One suggestion for improvement could be the integration of AI-driven search queries. This would allow users to receive suggestions based on asking questions rather than relying solely on keyword-based searches. > > Great so far. I like the refreshed UI and added featured for documentation collaboration as compared to previously when it was called RFPI ----- ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" — 4.0/5 > **Hector** | *27 March 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. > > **Cons**: The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. > > I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. ----- ### "Responsive - the RFP lifesaver" — 5.0/5 > **Marcus** | *28 April 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Before leveraging responsive, our team would spend hours or days hunting through old spreadsheets and pestering subject matter experts for the same five answers just because the question wasn't worded exactly the same. Now, the AI handles that first pass for us, and it’s surprisingly accurate. It actually pulls the right context for our security questionnaires and RFPs, which has cut our initial drafting time down to almost nothing. > > **Cons**: Sometimes the collaboration with guest accounts can be a bit iffy if I need to involve someone who is not on the platform, I don't always know if they've received the question or reviewed it. Contrasting this with a google docs @ tag, where it's easier to see revisions or they can resolve the tag, I often resort to slack to double check. > > On a daily basis, the platform actually feels like it was built for the people doing the work, not just the managers looking at the dashboard. It’s transformed our QA library from a messy fragmented and non contextual database into a resource we actually trust, which has made the day-to-day feel way more manageable and a resource we can trust. The AI is truly a life saver, I don't know what I'd do if my company ever looked to remove this tool.... Probably look for another job\! ----- ### "Management" — 2.0/5 > **Stephanie** | *29 April 2026* | Research | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: From a document management perspective, this system can serve as a centralized repository for our templates with controlled access. It also enables a “build once, use many” approach, allowing us to update shared or redundant sections in one place rather than across multiple templates. While we are still working on standardizing and organizing our templates to fully realize this capability, the long‑term efficiency and governance benefits are significant. > > **Cons**: At this time, the system does not appear to be very user‑friendly for our company’s needs. Our requirements may be too complex for its intended use. The time investment required to configure and organize our 20+ templates—each with roughly 10 sections or subsections—is substantial, especially considering this represents only a small portion of the overall system shared by three other groups. Additionally, day‑to‑day use would likely be more time‑consuming for our team than our current process. As a result, we may not be able to rely on the system for daily work and instead would primarily use it for template management, downloading templates into Word and editing from there, which mirrors how our assignments are currently handled. > > The system presents challenges from both an organizational and case‑development perspective and appears to be time‑consuming to set up and maintain. It is not as intuitive or efficient as working directly in Word for day‑to‑day use. That said, its primary strength lies in its ability to restrict update access and centrally manage templates, which provides stronger control and governance than our current approach. ----- ### "Best Solution in the Industry to Me" — 5.0/5 > **Susan** | *16 April 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The speed in which I can import projects. The export to original upload format. The AI, the AI\!\!\!\!\! The wonderful responsive, accurate, helpful support team. The incredible staff, webinars, coffee chats, and community > > **Cons**: When I find the hidden incapabiilties, contact the help team, and then realize that it is fact an incapability. For example, we can run one AI Draft per project; otherwise a staff member has to clone it to add an additional document. > > I lovvvve Responsive\! There is zero comparison to the tool I had previously that literally kept me working through the night\! ----- Page: 1 / 9\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/148054/Responsive) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data