--- description: Get detailed information about HackerRank and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about HackerRank price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: HackerRank Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Pre-employment Testing Software](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [HackerRank](/software/143549/hackerrank) # HackerRank Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/143549/hackerrank Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) > Industry-leading platform empowers tech recruiters to screen, interview, and hire top technical talent at scale. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 93 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses HackerRank? Any company that needs to hire technical talent such as software engineers, AI/ML engineers, data scientists and engineers, web and mobile developers, and more. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 93 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: HackerRank - **Founded**: 2012 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$199.00 - **Pricing model**: Usage Based (Free Trial) - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, American Samoa, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium and 208 more ## Features - Applicant Tracking - Assessment Management - Automatic Grading - Candidate Comparison - Candidate Management - Collaboration Tools - Customizable Questions - Customizable Tests - Data Import/Export - Interview Management - Interview Scheduling - Online Tests - Performance Metrics - Pre-Employment Testing - Pre-made Test Library - Question Library - Reporting/Analytics - Scoring - Skills Assessment - Template Management - Templates - Test/Quiz Creation - Tests/Assessments ## Integrations (6 total) - Avature - Greenhouse - JazzHR - Jobvite - Lever - Workable ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Pre-employment Testing Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Assessment Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Applicant Tracking Systems](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30060/applicant-tracking/software) - [Recruitment Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/30602/recruiting/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Zoho Recruit](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1268 reviews) 2. [micro1](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1077474/micro1) — 4.9/5 (823 reviews) 3. [100Hires](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/206957/100hires) — 4.9/5 (1187 reviews) 4. [ZipRecruiter](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10949 reviews) 5. [NEOGOV](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/75288/neogov) — 4.5/5 (850 reviews) ## Reviews ### "A Reliable Hiring Tool with Room to Grow Beyond Coding" — 4.0/5 > **Prishi** | *14 July 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: Key highlights include: Candidate activity monitoring – The platform tracks time-on-screen and captures screen size metadata, which helps reviewers assess candidate behavior and flag potential anomalies during assessments. Question library \& defaults – Adding default/pre-built questions is straightforward, making it easy to standardize assessments across roles without starting from scratch each time. Ease of setup – The overall configuration experience is intuitive, reducing the administrative overhead for hiring teams. These features collectively make HackerRank a strong choice for teams looking to run structured, auditable technical interviews at scale. > > **Cons**: While HackerRank excels in many areas, there are a few friction points worth noting: Custom question creation is cumbersome – Adding custom questions is not straightforward and can be time-consuming, especially for teams that need to tailor assessments beyond the default library. The process lacks the simplicity you'd expect given how polished the rest of the platform is. Diagram-based questions are challenging for candidates – When assessments include custom diagrams or drawing-type questions, candidates often struggle with the interface. The drawing tools are not intuitive, which can introduce unnecessary friction during the test and may affect performance for reasons unrelated to the candidate's actual skill. These limitations are worth considering if your hiring process relies heavily on custom or visual problem formats — in such cases, supplementing HackerRank with a dedicated diagramming or whiteboarding tool may be necessary. > > HackerRank is a solid platform for conducting technical assessments, particularly for programming and coding-focused evaluations. The built-in question library, candidate monitoring features, and ease of standardizing assessments make it a reliable choice for most engineering hiring workflows. That said, the platform has room to grow in certain areas: Architectural \& system design questions – HackerRank is not yet optimized for architecture-style assessments. The tooling for whiteboarding, diagramming, and evaluating system design thinking feels underdeveloped compared to its strong coding evaluation capabilities. ----- ### "Outstanding Partnership and Value" — 5.0/5 > **Georgia** | *27 February 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: How it enabled us to scale and to improve our processes. The platform is incredibly easy to navigate and use. It gives us a great window into how someone will perform in their interviews and shifting to live coding interviews has been game changing. > > **Cons**: In the interviews the video aspect isn't great and could potentially be smoother if it ran through Google Meet instead. > > Hugely positive. The team are great and very responsive, they are as invested as we are to innovate and overcome challenges and this makes for a fantastic partnership. Working with them has allowed us to run new processes, have reliable data to back up changes and trust in what we are trying to build - together. Excellent value for money, helping us to save vast amounts whilst not faltering on quality. ----- ### "Hackerrank review" — 5.0/5 > **Rajul** | *18 June 2026* | Computer Networking | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: \* Scalable technical assessments that allow evaluation of large candidate pools efficiently. \* Objective and standardized evaluation, helping reduce bias in the screening process. \* Wide library of role-based questions across coding, SQL, AI/ML, security, and other technical domain > > **Cons**: Extremely hard DSA \* Competitive programming questions \* Questions that feel unrelated to the actual role > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been positive. The platform has enabled us to efficiently assess technical talent at scale through standardized and objective evaluations. Its extensive question library, assessment customization options, and integrity features have helped improve the quality of candidate screening while reducing manual effort ----- ### "Easy assessment management, but the candidate experience needs improvement" — 3.0/5 > **Flavia** | *10 August 2026* | Staffing & Recruiting | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: From a recruiter’s perspective, HackerRank makes technical assessments easy to send and monitor. Its integration with Ashby allows me to see when a candidate completes an assessment and whether they passed, without having to request updates from the technical team. This makes standardized technical screening easier to manage at scale. > > **Cons**: Assessment invitations expire too quickly in our current setup, which creates unnecessary follow-up work when candidates cannot complete them in time. The Ashby integration shows whether a candidate passed, but does not provide recruiters with a detailed breakdown of the results. Candidates have also reported technical issues, including assessments becoming stuck. When an assessment contains multiple sections, the total time available is not always clear enough, and some candidates have run out of time before completing the second section. I would also like greater transparency around integrity monitoring. One candidate reported that consulting documentation and switching browser tabs generated a cheating-related concern. Tab activity may be useful as one signal, but it needs sufficient context because checking documentation can be part of a realistic development workflow. > > I use HackerRank from the recruiter side rather than managing or creating the technical assessments. It is convenient for sending tests, monitoring completion, and viewing pass or fail results through Ashby. This reduces manual coordination and makes the technical screening stage easier to track. However, my visibility into the actual results is limited, and recurring candidate complaints about unclear timing, technical issues, and integrity monitoring affect the overall experience. It is a useful screening tool, but assessment configuration and candidate communication need to be handled carefully to avoid losing qualified candidates for reasons unrelated to their technical ability. ----- ### "Very Satisfied with our Partnership with HackerRank\!" — 5.0/5 > **Tyra** | *19 March 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: We absolutely love the support we get when working with the HackerRank team. We've been working with \[sensitive content hidden\] for years now, and we are not shy about telling her that she is one of our favorite vendors to work with. \[sensitive content hidden\] goes out of her way to ensure we are fully informed on new offerings and opportunities to take advantage of. The HackerRank team is dedicated to making sure we are satisfied with their product. We had a few questions about a new offering recently, and their team offered to hold a session to walk our team through a demo and hold a Q\&A to ensure we felt enabled and empowered\! > > **Cons**: There's nothing that we would categorize as "disliking" about HackerRank. We have thoroughly enjoyed our partnership so far. > > Overall, our experience with HackerRank has been exceptionally positive. We feel very confident in the product, and the HackerRank team enables us to get the best use out of the partnership. ----- Page: 1 / 5\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/143549/hackerrank?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/143549/hackerrank) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data