--- description: Get detailed information about CondoVoter and how it can help you meet your business needs. Learn more about CondoVoter price, benefits, and disadvantages for businesses in Singapore. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: CondoVoter Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra Singapore 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Voting Software](/directory/31217/voting/software) > [CondoVoter](/software/1029111/condovoter) # CondoVoter Canonical: https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1029111/condovoter Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1029111/condovoter?page=2) > CondoVoter helps Community Association Managers and Boards bring online voting and virtual meetings to communities with ease. > > Verdict: Rated **4.7/5** by 43 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses CondoVoter? Property Managers, Community Association Managers, Homeowner Associations, Condo Boards, Strata Councils, Co-ops ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.7/5** | 43 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.8/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: CondoVoter - **Founded**: 2017 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: CA$450.00 - **Pricing model**: Per Feature - **Pricing Details**: Prices are per number of units and which meeting type. Starting price with lowest number of units starting at $450 Online Voting Only, Virtual Meeting Only and Bundle with Meeting Bundle Price Includes: 1. Preliminary notice to Owners by email 2. Notice of meeting to Owners by email 3. Registration of Owners for Virtual Meeting 4. Thirty (30) minute training session for Panelists (board members, chair, auditor etc.) and Moderating the Virtual Meeting (two(2) hours included) 5. Electronic Vote for the Meeting (Advanced and real time voting) 6. Telephone Vote for the meeting (Advanced and real time voting) 7. Scrutineer for the Meeting to report Voting results 8. Recording of the Meeting For more information, please go to https://condovoter.com/pricing/ - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Canada, United States ## Features - Ballot Management - Candidate Profiles - Election Management - Nominations - Online Voting - Polls/Voting - Reporting & Statistics - Turnout Tracking - Voter Authentication - Voter Management - Weighted Voting ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support ## Category - [Voting Software](https://www.capterra.com.sg/directory/31217/voting/software) ## Alternatives 1. [AssociationVoting](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/172696/associationvoting) — 4.7/5 (173 reviews) 2. [ElectionBuddy](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1017815/electionbuddy) — 4.9/5 (113 reviews) 3. [NemoVote](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/203575/nemovote) — 4.8/5 (68 reviews) 4. [FairVotes](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1011617/fairvotes) — 4.9/5 (33 reviews) 5. [Eligo](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1021608/eligo) — 4.7/5 (110 reviews) ## Reviews ### "The best meeting host at AGM." — 5.0/5 > **Phoebe** | *4 December 2025* | Building Materials | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Strong customer support, response promtly and prefessional. The system is very easy to use and understand. The price is very competitive. > > **Cons**: Nothing has been found yet. Everything is fine, and I am very satisfied with their service and support. > > Overall, my experience with CondoVoter has been good and their support team has been helpful. It's best meeting host I've been used. Very professional \& timely. ----- ### "We found a winner\!" — 5.0/5 > **Holly** | *15 July 2025* | Nonprofit Organization Management | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: How easy and efficient the site and staff were\! \[sensitive content hidden\] was so professional and knowledgeable. CondoVoter made what could be a stressful obstacle actually kind of fun\! > > **Cons**: The only thing that would be nice is if we could somehow find a way to "mark" and/or remove names of people who did not vote online to be removed from the "owners who have not voted" when they vote by paper ballot. We had so few, but it would still be nice to remove them from the list. > > CondoVoter is a wonderful tool. The staff (\[sensitive content hidden\] and \[sensitive content hidden\]) were both so helpful and knowledgeable and wanted our experience to be all that we hoped it would be. This was our second time using CondoVoter and we have recommended them to many others\! ----- ### "GSCC50 2026 AGM Review" — 5.0/5 > **Leera** | *25 February 2026* | Management Consulting | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: Client support and ease of use. We have worked with Condo Voter many times and each meeting has been a success. > > **Cons**: Nothing that I can think of off hand. The Moderators meeting informational slide show informing owner of how the meeting will work as well as meeting expectations is exceptionally good. > > Very professional moderators who are knowledgeable about the product (Condo Corporations, voting etc.) as well as technically inclined; well spoken and able to turn any challenge around to the satisfaction of the Board and owners within the meeting itself. ----- ### "Unprofessional Hybrid Setup" — 1.0/5 > **Kimberly** | *30 October 2024* | Real Estate | Recommendation rating: 1.0/10 > > **Pros**: The moderation was fine. The technical support was abysmal. > > **Cons**: I paid for technical setup and support for a hybrid meeting. I have never seen such unprofessional service at a meeting. The "tech" brought a sheet and a flimsy PVC frame to project our meeting. My Regional and I had to hold the PVC frame on each side because it wouldn't even stand on its own. The PVC frame was not correctly set up. The pieces of frame at the top were not connected so the whole "sheet" setup was folded. The tech was late, did not arrive until 15 minutes before the meeting start, and the setup wasn't complete until well after our meeting started. The sheet was dirty. I expected CondoVoter to bring a real projector screen. One of my residents commented that he hadn't seen a projection onto a sheet since he was a kid. It was frankly an embarrassment. ----- ### "Just great." — 5.0/5 > **David** | *8 March 2026* | Real Estate | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Our assigned Chair and Assistant. They were friendly and personable, and at the same time focused on process. > > **Cons**: Having to do the unit factor checkin for quorum myself. That's about the only thing that I didn't like. > > Our AGM was handled well. Our Chair and Assistant kept the meeting going, leading where appropriate for motions and process. Went very smoothly and professionally. ----- Page: 1 / 3\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1029111/condovoter?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.com.sg/software/1029111/condovoter) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | ----- ## Structured Data